|
|
|







|
|

CHAPTER THREE
POWER: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
The feminist movement
stemmed from women feeling disempowered. Men clearly controlled (and still
control) the reins of power in the political, financial, and judicial spheres,
which determine most of the obvious facets of personal and societal existence.
Thus, a primary goal of the women's movement has been to demand a share
in this power through equal pay and equal employment opportunities.
Power, in essence,
is the ability to effect change. If women have financial clout or high political
or business positions, it is thought, then they too can determine the changes
that will affect their lives and the lives of others.
But the feminist
crusade has failed to recognize another, more subtle, form of power: internal
power, the ability to affect other people's ethics and values. While external
power may procure a high corporate position, internal power will determine
whether that corporate executive will be honest or embezzle from the corporation.
Women's quest for
external power has left a frightening vacuum in Western society in the area
of moral training, where women formerly held sway. Rampant crime, child
abuse, kidnapping, and violence against women are symptoms of a society
gone amok, where many people have no concept of right and wrong, of honesty,
fairness, compassion, or self-control. Only a generation ago, American stores
did not have security devices or guards checking bags at every exit; the
prevalent sense of honesty made shoplifting a rare occurrence. Such basic
morality now seems as outdated as propeller planes or fishnet stockings.
Today's internal
decadence is eroding the quality of life in America as fast as external
political and technological advances are improving it. A pointed, tragic
example is the case of the "Central Park jogger," a woman who
had succeeded in the traditionally male field of stock brokerage and who
was earning a salary commensurate with her abilities. She was brutally beaten
and gang-raped by a group of teenagers who had no idea who she was. They
saw their actions not as a political or racial statement, but as a sport.
Violence against
women has risen dramatically in America in the last decade. After the 1999
Woodstock concert ended in flames, reports began to come in which found
that women were assaulted and raped. The official response, says NOW NYC
President Galen Sherwin, has been to deny that the rapes occurred, and to
dismiss their importance.
A report published
in American College Health (Sept 1997) uncovered a shocking statistic. One
out of fifteen young women surveyed reported they had been forced to have
sexual intercourse. Clearly, the lot of women cannot be improved by political
and financial progress if the inner dimension of society - its morals and
compassion - is neglected by the very people who have traditionally been
its custodians: women.
|
|
|